Corrosion Authority
Criterion

100 mV Polarization Criterion

Criterion quick answer

The 100 mV Polarization Criterion requires evidence of at least 100 mV of cathodic polarization within the applicable asset scope.

It is a change criterion, not an absolute-potential threshold. The required change may be demonstrated by polarization formation or polarization decay where the governing asset standard permits that path. An Instant-OFF value alone does not establish 100 mV polarization.

Applies to

The controlling transformed authority authorizes 100 mV cathodic-polarization criterion treatment for:

  • steel and gray/ductile cast-iron piping within SP0169-2024 scope;
  • steel UST structures within SP0285-2021 scope;
  • on-grade carbon-steel tank bottoms within SP0193-2016 scope.

Asset-specific measurement provisions remain in force.

What is being evaluated?

The criterion evaluates a change in potential caused by cathodic polarization. It does not ask whether the structure is 100 mV more negative than −850 mV, 100 mV different between any two readings, or 100 mV different between ON and OFF by default.

Path 1 — Polarization formation

  1. Establish a defensible pre-polarization/free-corrosion comparison state.
  2. Apply or increase cathodic protection.
  3. Establish a defensible later polarized state.
  4. Demonstrate at least the required cathodic potential shift.
  5. Confirm valid measurement conditions.

An unstable or changing native/free-corrosion state can undermine the comparison.

Path 2 — Polarization decay

  1. Establish a defensible starting polarized state.
  2. Interrupt or remove protective current under controlled conditions.
  3. Measure potential as polarization decays.
  4. Demonstrate the required loss of cathodic polarization.
  5. Confirm valid measurement conditions.

A valid Instant-OFF measurement commonly provides the starting polarized-potential value. Complete return to the original free-corrosion potential is not inherently required once the required decay has been demonstrated where the governing method permits that conclusion.

Instant-OFF is not the criterion

Instant-OFF can establish the starting polarized potential for a decay measurement. A second defensible potential is required to show the amount of polarization change.

Instant-OFF value alone → not enough evidence.

Decision logic

  1. Applicability: establish that the asset is within an authorized 100 mV criterion scope.
  2. Measurement path: establish an authorized formation or decay approach.
  3. Comparison states: establish technically defensible starting and ending states for that path.
  4. Measurement foundation: control reference basis, placement, meter/circuit condition, current state, interruption, timing, and relevant interference conditions.
  5. Polarization change: only now determine whether the defensible comparison demonstrates at least 100 mV of cathodic polarization.

What does not establish compliance

  • ON − OFF = 100 mV.
  • Any arbitrary 100 mV difference.
  • Instant-OFF being 100 mV more negative than −850 mV.
  • A 100 mV shift measured from an unstable or undefined baseline.
  • A decay value with an invalid starting Instant-OFF measurement.
  • A comparison affected by uncontrolled current/interference without resolving validity.

Field cautions

  • A stable baseline matters.
  • An invalid Instant-OFF starting point invalidates a decay comparison even if the arithmetic exceeds 100 mV.
  • Do not assume one universal interruption duration or decay interval.
  • Depolarization is not synonymous with Instant-OFF.
  • This criterion is not interchangeable with the −850 mV CP Criterion.

Next action

Use Polarization for the change/state terminology, Instant-OFF Potential to validate an interrupted starting value, IR Drop for voltage-drop effects, Reference Electrode and Reference-Electrode Placement for reference controls, Meter Loading for circuit-loading validity, and −850 mV CP Criterion when evaluating the separate absolute-potential route.

Technical visuals

Formation and decay are controlled comparison paths between defensible states; this is not an ON-minus-OFF calculation.
Formation and decay are controlled comparison paths between defensible states; this is not an ON-minus-OFF calculation.

Related resources